Indeed, the record is clear: when Food & Water Watch convinces towns to reject private sector solutions, local governments often lack the resources and the expertise to address aging infrastructure issues – and their water quality problems worsen.įood & Water Watch often cites Trenton, NJ, as a positive example of a town rejecting a partnership with a professional water company.
These activists block proven solutions and promise a mythical “better deal” before leaving communities empty-handed. Blinded by a strict anti-private sector ideology, these activists may be good at raising issues, but they are bad at providing solutions to towns like Edison facing water infrastructure challenges. The involvement of Food & Water Watch in Edison’s decision about the future of its water system should raise red flags for residents. I implore you to vote “No” in this election and prevent Food & Water Watch from tying Edison’s hands and banning all potential partnerships with water professionals from the private sector. However, out-of-town ideologues like Food & Water Watch are launching a massive smear campaign against private investment in Edison’s water infrastructure that has resulted in a special election on the issue set for Sept.
0 kommentar(er)
